Pre-Modern States
aas-322
Two Common Assumptions about “Pre-Modern States”
- pre-modern states developed with little systematic knowledge of the populations they governed
- [CHECK] pre-modern states had limited ability to reshape everyday civil society; instead, they relied on indirect rule through local intermediaries over top-down social engineering
Examples of “Pre-Modern States”
The Igbos of West Africa
| a comprehensive explanatory framework | • a system of folk beliefs accounting for the origin of everything in the world • explains the functions of both heavenly and earthly bodies • provides moral guidance for conduct toward gods, spirits, and ancestors |
|---|---|
| a populated universe | • the world is inhabited by invisible and visible forces • three coexisting categories of persons: ◦ the living ◦ the dead ◦ those yet to be born |
| continuity across realms | • reincarnation serves as the bridge linking the living and the dead • time and community are cyclical, not linear - the ancestral and the unborn are present participants in the social world |
-
Means of preserving the history and practices of the community
-
Must care for the environment
→ future generations (including those reincarnated) can experience the same quality of life
-
death seen as a trip to the afterlife; emphasis on funeral ceremonies
-
good karma - treat environment with respect, as it provides the people with all of their needs; treat the dead with respect, as they may one day come back and protect you
The KayapO people of the Brazilian Amazon
| environment as an integrated system | social organizations | ceremony as social and ecological glue |
|---|---|---|
| one interlocking system: community, plant/forest, and wildlife management | communal society grounded in principles of egalitarianism | rich ceremonial life binds members into a single collective entity |
| goal is to increase biological diversity - not simply conserve or extract | storytelling: histories and legends transmitted to younger generations at ceremonies | |
| the forest supplies all subsistence needs | dance: celebrates nature and marks the changing of the seasons |
- The complexity of this society contradicts the goal of states to simplify a community
- emphasis on diversity, and not misusing the resources that nature/society provides
The Balinese “Subak” of Indonesia
graph TD
A[The Subak] --> B[literally “the irrigation society”]
B --> C[devoted specifically and exclusively to irrigated farming]
C --> D[the wet/dry distinction]
D --> E[“Subak” = the “wet village” - the domain of water, rice, and cultivation]
E --> F[residential/livable environment = the “dry village]
F --> G[two parallel institutional orders, each with its own membership, obligations, and authority]
The Nature-Culture Dichotomy: Ritual as Environmental Management, Not Mystification
The Common Misreading
- rituals tied to environmental management in pre-modern states are often misconstrued as a mere “infusion of nature into culture”
- this framing obscures their practical and organizational functions
The New Yam Festival (Igbo, West Africa)
-
held at the close of the harvest season
-
farmers and residents gather to display their harvest - a public accounting of a successful farming period
-
ancestors are praised for enabling the harvest, while a better yield is anticipated for the coming year
-
forbidden from eating the new yam before the festival
-
business perspective: makes sure those who have old harvest in stock are able to sell them
- if people were allowed to sell the new yams, nobody would want to buy the old ones anymore
The Rice Goddess (Bali)
- successful rice cultivation is attributed to the rice goddess Sri Dewi
- yet efficacy depends on community mechanisms for coordinated planting and harvesting being properly in place
Environment, Nature and the Emergence of New States
15th and 16th century: beginning of a centralized system of administration in most states
1648 Westphalia Treaty
- precursor to the modern day state system
20th century: emergence of a modern state system
New States, Social Structures, and Reordering of Nature
| Centralization and the disciplining of population | Institutionalization of new state practices |
|---|---|
| International relations and mapping | New processes of adjudication |